-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Adam Freedman
For today’s episode: In honor of Mother’s Day last week, we ask: do you have what it takes to be a good Mommy? Legally speaking, that is.
But first, your daily dose of legalese: This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship with any listener. In other words, although I am a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer. In fact, we barely know each other. If you need personalized legal advice, contact an attorney in your community.
How Do You Prove a Mother is Unfit?
Rachel from Tennessee asks: “What does it take to prove a mother unfit in court?”
Great question, Rachel! The short answer is that in deciding whether a mother -- or father -- is “unfit” as a parent, a court will assess a number of factors, but the overriding1 concern is the best interest of the child.
Then: The “Tender Years” Rule
As a legal matter, the question of a mother’s “fitness” arises in cases where the custody2 of one or more child is in dispute. Custody is, of course, an issue in divorce cases, and it can also come up when unmarried parents can’t agree on custody arrangements.
Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, most American states adopted a rule known as the “Maternal Presumption3” or -- somewhat more whimsically -- the “Tender Years Doctrine4.” Under this rule, custody of minor5 children was usually awarded to the mother, unless -- and here’s where we get back to the question -- it could be proven that the mother was not “fit.” Evidence that a mother was unfit would include mental illness, alcoholism, or an abusive relationship with the child.
Now: The Best Interests of the Child
Nowadays, only a few states have a presumption in favor of the mother. Most states have embraced a standard of equality: neither parent is assumed to be a more appropriate parent. In all states, the paramount6 consideration in deciding child custody cases is the “best interest of the child.”
Having said that, most states’ family courts allow a preference in custody cases for the parent who can demonstrate that he or she was the child’s “primary caretaker” during the course of the marriage or relationship with the other parent. The primary caretaker rule has gained acceptance due to the evidence of psychologists regarding the bond between a child and his or her primary caretaker as very important.
So, in custody disputes today, courts are not looking at the fitness of the mother as such, but are usually analyzing7 whether giving custody to the “primary caretaker” is in the best interest of the child. However, the fitness of the primary caretaker is, of course, an important consideration in determining the best interests of the child.
It’s Not Easy Being Unfit
The bottom line is that it is usually very difficult to prove that the child’s primary caretaker – be it the mother or a father – is unfit to have custody of the child. A mother won’t be considered unfit just because she doesn’t have a complete library of Baby Einstein DVDs. Rather, there has to be some showing of endangerment to the child. The specific elements of parental8 fitness are a matter of state law, but they often include such factors as:
A history of domestic violence;
Excessive discipline or emotional abuse of the child;
A history of drug or alcohol abuse; or
A previous conviction for a sexual offense9.
Working Doesn’t Make You Unfit
The fact that a mother works should not count against her “fitness” to have custody of her child, provided that she can make arrangements for child care while she is working. However, if there is a major difference in workload10 between the two parents, the parent with the flexibility11 to spend significantly more time with the child might have an advantage in a custody battle.
Again, custody laws differ from state to state, and the outcome will depend on the facts of the specific case. You should always consult with an attorney when a custody issue arises.
You can send questions and comments to。。。。。。or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
1 overriding | |
a.最主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 custody | |
n.监护,照看,羁押,拘留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 presumption | |
n.推测,可能性,冒昧,放肆,[法律]推定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 paramount | |
a.最重要的,最高权力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 analyzing | |
v.分析;分析( analyze的现在分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析n.分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 parental | |
adj.父母的;父的;母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 offense | |
n.犯规,违法行为;冒犯,得罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 workload | |
n.作业量,工作量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|