-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Facebook says that it wants to make it harder for advertisers to use Facebook as a tool for discrimination. But whatever it's trying was apparently1 too little for the Department of Housing and Urban Development because HUD says it is charging Facebook with violating the Fair Housing Act over the way that it allowed advertisers to target and exclude some users. We should note before going on that Facebook is one of NPR's financial supporters. We are nevertheless reporting independently on it, and NPR's Brakkton Booker is here. Brakkton, good morning.
BRAKKTON BOOKER, BYLINE2: Hi, Steve.
INSKEEP: According to HUD, how does Facebook discriminate3?
BOOKER: Well, as you said in the intro there, HUD is saying that Facebook violated the Fair Housing Act. And that, of course, is a federal protection that was established in 1968. It protects homebuyers and renters from being discriminated4 against on the basis of race and religion and other protected classes. Now, HUD is saying that Facebook is - allows advertisers to shield who can see which ads appear on their platform on the basis of race.
INSKEEP: Do you mean that if an advertiser only wanted white people to see an apartment ad - just to give a hypothetical - that Facebook would allow that to happen?
BOOKER: Yes, there are certain things that advertisers can click on the platform that allow certain people to see. So if they are - if a Facebook user kind of identifies as a African-American dog-lover and Facebook only wants to appear to, say, an Anglo cat-lover, they can select different things on the platform that allows - that shields certain people from seeing certain ads on their platform.
INSKEEP: On the most basic level, I'm genuinely curious how Facebook is convinced it knows the race of people because, of course, the platform asks for your name, asks for your phone number, asks for your birthday, a lot of other things. I don't know if they directly ask for race, but they must get it from somewhere.
BOOKER: Well, HUD is saying in their charging document that Facebook mined extensive data about users and uses that data to determine which users can see housing-related ads. So in theory, because of things that you like and things that you share, there are some kind of algorithms that allow advertisers and Facebook to know kind of who these people are.
INSKEEP: One of the reasons that this feels meaningful to me, Brakkton, is that I've done a lot of reporting on discriminatory housing or some reporting on discriminatory housing in the past and spoke5 with real estate brokers6 around Chicago who described the process of racial steering7. Like, who do you show a house to? Who do you hint to about whether they should or shouldn't live in a particular neighborhood? It can be very subtle, but very powerful in segregating8 neighborhoods. You're telling me that is exactly what Facebook did, according to HUD.
BOOKER: Well, it's really the advertiser. So it's the advertiser's...
INSKEEP: Facebook allowed...
BOOKER: Allow - allows advertisers - when they want to create an ad, when they're trying to look for the perfect tenant9 or the perfect homebuyer, they can start to select certain characteristics to make sure that, you know, the people that are seeing these ads are kind of the target audience that they want.
INSKEEP: And the excluded person doesn't even know they're being excluded.
BOOKER: They don't know. They don't know.
INSKEEP: They don't see the ad. They never see the availability. What has Facebook been saying about these accusations10, which I think have been out for a little while?
BOOKER: Yes, so this comes on the heels of what Facebook and some housing advocates say was a historic settlement that happened last week. Facebook said they were going to do better, and they were going to make changes to the platform to not allow advertisers to selective - to...
INSKEEP: Selectively - yeah.
BOOKER: ...Selectively put out their ads. So they said they were making changes. They vowed11 to do better, and they said these changes are going to come about later on this year.
INSKEEP: And now HUD's coming after them. Brakkton, thanks so much - really appreciate it.
BOOKER: Absolutely.
INSKEEP: That's NPR's Brakkton Booker.
1 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 discriminate | |
v.区别,辨别,区分;有区别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 discriminated | |
分别,辨别,区分( discriminate的过去式和过去分词 ); 歧视,有差别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 brokers | |
n.(股票、外币等)经纪人( broker的名词复数 );中间人;代理商;(订合同的)中人v.做掮客(或中人等)( broker的第三人称单数 );作为权力经纪人进行谈判;以中间人等身份安排… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 steering | |
n.操舵装置 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 segregating | |
(使)分开( segregate的现在分词 ); 分离; 隔离; 隔离并区别对待(不同种族、宗教或性别的人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tenant | |
n.承租人;房客;佃户;v.租借,租用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 accusations | |
n.指责( accusation的名词复数 );指控;控告;(被告发、控告的)罪名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 vowed | |
起誓,发誓(vow的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|