-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
Election officials are expecting to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on new voting equipment before next year's elections. This is the biggest wave of purchases in over a decade. And it comes at a time of increased concern about election security. It also comes amid questions about the close relationship between voting machine vendors1 and the officials who are buying their equipment. And to talk about this, I'm joined by NPR's Pam Fessler, who covers the issue.
Hi there, Pam.
PAM FESSLER, BYLINE2: Hi, David.
GREENE: Let me start with a basic question. Why now are we seeing so many voting machines being purchased?
FESSLER: Well, there are two reasons. First, a lot of the existing equipment that state and local election officials now use was purchased after the 2000 elections. And it's just getting old. It needs to be replaced. The second reason is security. Especially in light of concerns about Russian hacking3 attempts, there's this nationwide push to replace all paperless voting machines, which are still used in about a dozen states, with ones that produce paper ballots6. These paper ballots can always be counted to make sure that the results are accurate in case there are any concerns. So we are seeing entire states like Georgia, South Carolina and Delaware getting all new equipment. And some big states like California, Pennsylvania and Ohio are also buying new machines.
GREENE: OK. So why are people raising alarm bells about how these companies - or which companies are selling these machines?
FESSLER: It's a really, really small industry. Three vendors dominate the market. We have Election Systems & Software known as ES&S, then Dominion7 Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic. And it's a really small community. The vendors, the election officials, they all know each other. They've been working together for years. They go to conferences together. Sometimes, the vendors sponsor the conferences. And the companies also hire former election officials to work for them. There was a big controversy8 last year when it was revealed that a number of election officials were serving on an ES&S customer advisory9 board.
GREENE: Oh, wow.
FESSLER: The purpose was to discuss voting trends and to, you know, share information. But it also meant that ES&S was paying thousands of dollars for some of these officials to travel to cities such as Las Vegas for meetings. And that raised some eyebrows10, you know, especially at a time when states are spending all this money to buy new equipment.
GREENE: I mean, you want to assume that election officials are making decisions based on what's best for voters and for election security in the country. Is there any evidence that these ties have had some sort of negative influence over these decisions?
FESSLER: I haven't seen any evidence of, like, a quid pro4 quo. But I do think it's about appearances. And we're at a time when officials are trying to instill public confidence to make people feel more comfortable in the integrity of our elections, that there's nothing nefarious11 going on. But we have cases where recently, Pennsylvania's auditor12 general asked all the county election officials in the state if they'd accepted gifts from vendors, and 18 said that they had. These gifts ranged from, you know, trips paid to Las Vegas but also to things like, you know, boxes of chocolate-covered pretzels. But the auditor general said even small gifts, quote, "smacks13 of impropriety." And this has become a really, really big issue in Georgia, where reporter Johnny Kauffman of member station WABE has been covering the debate over what new voting machines the state should buy.
WILL WESLEY: Once they sign in, they're issued an activation14 card. The voter would insert that in the machine.
JOHNNY KAUFFMAN, BYLINE: Will Wesley and I are standing15 in a crowded room near the Georgia Statehouse, looking at a table covered with touchscreen computers and some printers. Wesley is with the company ES&S. And he and some reps from other companies are here to show off voting equipment. Wesley chooses his favorite candidates by tapping one of ES&S's touch screens.
WESLEY: Now I'm going to go ahead and mark my card.
KAUFFMAN: The printer spits out a paper ballot5 with his selections he calls a card. Wesley picks up the piece of paper that just printed, looks at it and slides it into a scanner.
WESLEY: Doesn't matter - upside-down, backwards16. It scans it. It takes approximately two to three seconds for it to scan. Thank you for voting. Your ballot's been counted. And it drops down into the ballot box.
KAUFFMAN: Earlier this year around the time of this demonstration17, the state legislature was in session. And after the contested 2018 midterms in Georgia, election policy debates got especially heated. Republicans were pushing to change the law so the state would buy touch-screen voting machines, the kind ES&S and other companies are competing to sell the state. Republicans say the machines eliminate confusion over who voters intended to cast their ballot for. And they point out that election officials want the machines. But Democrats18 argued the voting machines are vulnerable to hacks19 and malfunction20.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
ELENA PARENT: Come on. This is a joke.
KAUFFMAN: That's Democratic state senator Elena Parent. Parent and other Democrats unsuccessfully argued for hand-marked paper ballots instead of the machines. During debate in the legislature, they brought up ES&S again and again, alleging21 corruption22 between the company and GOP officials.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PARENT: I've been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There's not one good reason. So therefore, it just reeks23 of corruption that we're prioritizing vendors over voters.
KAUFFMAN: There's no evidence of any rule-breaking. But there is a long list of ES&S staff and contractors24 with relationships to Georgia officials. Among them, the company's VP of government relations used to be the director of elections in the secretary of state's office. And a former ES&S lobbyist is the deputy chief of staff to Gov. Brian Kemp. Jeb Cameron is the regional sales manager in Georgia for ES&S, and he also used to work for the state.
JEB CAMERON: Of course we've built relationships in the state. I would say we wouldn't be doing our job if we didn't build those close relationships.
KAUFFMAN: Georgia is set to buy new voting machines ahead of 2020. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office will award the contract. Here he is at a press conference earlier this year.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER: I want to make sure that Georgians get the best possible value for what we're going to buy that's going to last us for the next 10 to 12 years.
KAUFFMAN: Raffensperger himself has few connections to ES&S, but he ran on the same GOP ticket as Gov. Brian Kemp, who does. I wanted to ask Raffensperger how he can guarantee this election process will be fair, but his staff didn't make him available for an interview or answer questions about how it's picking the new machines.
GREENE: Johnny Kauffman there giving us a window into this close relationship between election officials and these companies in the state of Georgia. NPR's Pam Fessler - still with me - she covers this around the country. Pam, what can be done to assure voters in the time that election security is such a big issue - you know, reassuring25 them that officials are making the best decisions here when it comes to buying equipment?
FESSLER: I think it's all about transparency. Some members of Congress have called for more federal oversight26 of vendors. But so far, those proposals haven't gone anywhere. State and local governments, which run elections, they don't want the federal government telling them what to do. But I do think, because there's so much concern about election security, that these deals are going to get a lot more public scrutiny27 in the coming year. And the vendors and the election officials are well aware of that. For its part, ES&S says it's no longer going to have those advisory board meetings planned because they don't want to put election officials in a compromising position.
GREENE: I see - already taking some steps. All right, NPR's Pam Fessler.
Pam, we appreciate it.
FESSLER: Thanks.
1 vendors | |
n.摊贩( vendor的名词复数 );小贩;(房屋等的)卖主;卖方 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 hacking | |
n.非法访问计算机系统和数据库的活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 pro | |
n.赞成,赞成的意见,赞成者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 ballots | |
n.投票表决( ballot的名词复数 );选举;选票;投票总数v.(使)投票表决( ballot的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 dominion | |
n.统治,管辖,支配权;领土,版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 advisory | |
adj.劝告的,忠告的,顾问的,提供咨询 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 eyebrows | |
眉毛( eyebrow的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 nefarious | |
adj.恶毒的,极坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 auditor | |
n.审计员,旁听着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 smacks | |
掌掴(声)( smack的名词复数 ); 海洛因; (打的)一拳; 打巴掌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 activation | |
n. 激活,催化作用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 backwards | |
adv.往回地,向原处,倒,相反,前后倒置地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 demonstration | |
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 hacks | |
黑客 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 malfunction | |
vi.发生功能故障,发生故障,显示机能失常 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 alleging | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 reeks | |
n.恶臭( reek的名词复数 )v.发出浓烈的臭气( reek的第三人称单数 );散发臭气;发出难闻的气味 (of sth);明显带有(令人不快或生疑的跡象) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 reassuring | |
a.使人消除恐惧和疑虑的,使人放心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|