-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Broadcast: Jan 27, 2003
When Congress returned to session earlier this month, one of the first orders of business was to revise an ethics1 standard known as the "Pizza Rule", a law that makes it acceptable for lobbyists to send complimentary2 food to congressional staffers working late at night. The "Pizza Rule" is one example of the kinds of ethical3 issues being discussed in one of the most popular classes now being offered at American University in Washington, D.C.
"Here I came to D.C. thinking‘Oh, I'm going to make a lot of money as a lobbyist.' Turns out I did end up working on the Hill and learned that most lobbyists who really follow their heart, don't make that much money," says Kate Arnold, a political science undergraduate. She is one of about three dozen students enrolled4 in the annual two-week workshop at AU's Public Affairs and Advocacy Institute, formerly5 known as the Lobbying Institute.
Taking advantage of its setting in the nation's capital, the class features guest speakers from the American University 2)faculty6, as well as leading lobbyists from around the country, representing corporations, trade associations, labor7 unions and public interest and lobbying firms. Coordinating8 the workshop is academic director, Patrick J. Griffin, who is also president and founder9 of his own lobbying firm in Washington.
Mr. Griffin says while a lobbyist is defined as a person who works to bring about the passage of laws favorable to the special interest group they represent, the job encompasses10 much more. "I think it takes this is a very personal town -- and relationships are a very essential component11 of most 3)advocacy work here in town. But it's more than that," he says. "You have to have a good understanding of policy, you have to have a good understanding of process and how to relate those elements together. And I think, that, with the integrity of how you deal with that will constitute the foundation for being a good lobbyist."
But for many people, the term lobbyist may sound vague or confusing conjuring12 a kind of negative 4)caricature of a rich, portly figure who wines and dines lawmakers, while slipping money into their pockets. American University student Bob Nardo says that image is one that is fast fading from reality.
"The people who are trying those techniques are people who are losing remarkably13, from everything we learned here," he says. "The great thing about this institute is that there has been a heavy emphasis on ethics and understanding of why we do what we do and recognizing that those sort of patters have existed in the past and still do exist. But that pattern is out of style. It has almost been humorous at times the most effective lobbyists here are people that lobbied on things like NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] who led up those coalitions15, have actually come in and chuckled16 at that notion of lobbying, saying that 'In a world that's as information rich as it today, it's not possible for you to just come in and slap a few backs and pass out some cigars.'"
American University professor Patrick Griffin agrees that lobbyists come in all "shapes and colors and get all different size paychecks." "The individuals working for the Children's Defense17 Fund or the Sierra Club are not burdened by their salaries. These make reasonable incomes but are not exorbitant18 by any stretch and they are lobbying on behalf of the issues that are important to them," he says. "It is also a lucrative19 field for those working in the consulting business to organizations and institutions or people who work in a corporation as a permanent lobbyist here in Washington. It is a very diverse field, but I think a very essential field to decision-making in Washington."
Some of the speakers who have participated in the Public Affairs workshop have included a bureau chief for Fortune magazine; a vice20 president of health policy for the Institute for Higher Education Policy; and a corporate21 vice president of Honeywell Corporation.
Political science student Kate Arnold describes the class as "wonderful" for the opportunity to meet and talk with experts in the field. "And I mean experts, real working professionals who have been in the business of lobbying and been in the business of legislation and public policy and grass roots and coalition14 building and everything that you could possibly imagine under the sun. And they've been doing it here and elsewhere for years," she says. "It's priceless, really. So (you know) this course has has given us not only a lot of insights, but a lot of networking opportunities and lots of connections. I went down my list of presenters22 and put a big star next to half a dozen of them that I intend to call on after I'm finished with my education to ask for a job, frankly23."
Student Bob Nardo says while many of his classmates are hoping to find jobs on Capitol Hill, he plans to use the skills he's learned working outside of Washington, D.C. in school reform. He says he believes most of the students taking the class are fueled by their desire to be able to make a difference. "I wish you could take a picture and transmit it across radio because if you could look at the range of faces and the starry24 eyes of the idealistic twenty year-olds in here, I think you'd forget instantly about the cigar-smoking and backslapping image of a lobbyist and think of the kind of young person who you know who knocked on your door walking down the street at every election season, asking you to think about what's important to them and what's important to you," he says. "That's what public affairs policy advocacy is all about - at least, as we can see from this class, which will probably comprise the next generation of quote-unquote-lobbyists."
Bob Nardo is an undergraduate student at American University's Public Affairs and Advocacy Institute. Workshop coordinator25 Patrick Griffin says whether or not the students actually become lobbyists themselves, the class provides a window on how Washington works, what lobbying is about, and how it can be done with integrity and ethical foundations.
1) lobbyist[5lRbIIst]n.活动议案通过者, 说客
2) faculty [5fAkElti]n.全体教员, (大学的)系, 科,
3) advocacy [5AdvEkEsi]n.拥护, 鼓吹, 辩护
4) caricature [7kArikE5tjuE]n.讽刺画, 漫画, 歪曲(或拙劣)的模仿
1 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 complimentary | |
adj.赠送的,免费的,赞美的,恭维的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 enrolled | |
adj.入学登记了的v.[亦作enrol]( enroll的过去式和过去分词 );登记,招收,使入伍(或入会、入学等),参加,成为成员;记入名册;卷起,包起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 coordinating | |
v.使协调,使调和( coordinate的现在分词 );协调;协同;成为同等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 encompasses | |
v.围绕( encompass的第三人称单数 );包围;包含;包括 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 conjuring | |
n.魔术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 remarkably | |
ad.不同寻常地,相当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 coalitions | |
结合体,同盟( coalition的名词复数 ); (两党或多党)联合政府 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 chuckled | |
轻声地笑( chuckle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 exorbitant | |
adj.过分的;过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 lucrative | |
adj.赚钱的,可获利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 presenters | |
n.节目主持人,演播员( presenter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 starry | |
adj.星光照耀的, 闪亮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 coordinator | |
n.协调人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 robin | |
n.知更鸟,红襟鸟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|